🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a misguided assessment of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "woke" policies pose an existential risk to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the situation. The actual danger facing the EU is not cultural but economic and technological backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Gap Between the US and Europe

Statistics reveal a stark contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by eighty-seven percent, compared to a paltry 13.5% increase for the EU. During this time, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Remarkably, even Mississippi now boasts a higher per capita income than major European economies like Italy and France.

Today, roughly half of the world’s 50 largest technology firms are American, while only four are European.

The Innovation Deficit: The Core Question

This widening disparity stems from stronger efficiency gains in the United States, largely due to technological innovation and better use of resources. The landscape of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly American. Over the past fifty years, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at over ten billion dollars, compared with only fourteen in the European continent.

This disparity raises a vital question: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, where does Europe positioned? Most analysts concede it is essentially a contest between two between the US and China, with Europe starting at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Technological Lag

Several major factors account for this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic network for financing new ventures. Europe still lacks a genuine unified investment market, a factor that caps the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented rules hinder European business. A US startup can launch a service under a single set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population, is split among 27 different national systems, creating huge market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to advance serious reform. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the internal market point to the need for sweeping reforms.

Given appropriate policies and regulatory reforms, these assets might enable far greater degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains considerable advantages: skilled human capital, excellent education systems, and premier labs. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these elements have the potential to trigger a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing next-generation technologies, it can still significantly increase economic output by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, Europe's slide in innovation has been steady. However, without decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.